1-El artículo del blog critica a la cgt por decir en su hoja "se pretende firmar el acuerdo con la empresa", que es similar a decir "se va a firmar", por lo tanto no es cierto que se acuse a la cgt de haber dicho que el foro haya firmado algo.
2 En el párrafo final de la primera página, dice la cgt que el foro europeo les dará la llave para llevar a cabo parte de esta reestructuración.
Esto también es similar a acusar al foro europeo de aceptar el recorte de plantilla.
3 Es consecuente que el EEF se sienta injuriado y traicionado por la cgt después de la lectura de dicha hoja.
La cgt debe aprender que cuando un sindicato negocia con una empresa, ello no supone cometer un acto ilícito a espaldas de los trabajadores, sino que negocia en representación de ellos, que es uno de sus principales cometidos.
4 A los lectores de este blog nos gustaría que la cgt no tirara la piedra y luego escondiera la mano.
Preferimos que de una a vez se ponga a trabajar para empezar a generar soluciones ante los cada vez más graves problemas de los trabajadores, en vez de servir de lastre a quien sí trabaja, haciéndoles además a estos perder tiempo y energías tan necesarios en su difícil cometido.

First of all the blog has a netiquette which has been published and as long as it is not violated articles and comments will be published for sure. That's the idea and it is a reality. Sometimes it is difficult to deal with that technically when a wave of spams overflows the system. I can also happen that it lasts some time between sending the article to the blog and posting it. The group of admins of the blog who approve the articles technically do not work for the blog the whole time. They do it voluntarily. So 24 hours guarantee cannot be given ;)The article you are referring to is "sailing close to the wind" so to speak. But even the accuse of "betrayal" we think is covered by the right of free speech and it is the right of the accused to respond to it. That's the idea of the blog. In fact the big majority of the contributions to the blog are fair and focused on the issue. But let's make one comment from my side: Whatever the issue maybe, on behalf of the workers should the main struggle happen between unions and management whenever it is necessary but not between unions. Divided workforces and divided works councils fail and will loose to GM. That is a risk that no union one should easily accept.It is easy to say no, but workers have also a right to get a more detailed strategy by the unions how to deal with challenges.