Automatic translation:                  
03/06/2007

Job cuts in Antwerp - don't forget who wanted to close the plant!

As far as I can understand the flemish articles and comments in the blog my impression is that this kind if discussion is really going into a dangerous and wrong direction. First of all nobody should forget that the original plan of General Motors was to close down this plant.

We lost last year the Azambuja plant and we all knew that fighting against a closure of a Delta plant would be a real challenge and not just a game. 5 plants for the next Delta - everybody knew there wouldn't be enough volume to fully utilize all these plants with Opel and Vauxhall Delta cars. But the EEF with all its union and works council representatives made GM Management quite clear that if they try to close a plant they would get a real fight which would hurt the whole business in Europe. But also everybody was aware that this kind of fight no side would be able to win it. The result had been a defeat for the company and for the union and workers. But the EEF was convinced that after Azambuja we had to stop the next potential plant closure with all our strengths taken all the consequences ("moving East") in consideration. A next plant closure would have been an enormous impact also for all the other plants taken their future at risk. So don't forget that Antwerp was ready for closure according to General Motors. And also please do not forget that dealing with GM means to deal with a multinational company which is going to close approx. 12 plants in North America.The decision of GM Management not to allocate the next Delta in Antwerp was a political decision and a slap in the face of all the Antwerp workers, but it doesn't help to complain or even to strike for weeks or months trying to fight against a global company. For every strike you do need in the end a potential solution. So the next step was important for the EEF to put pressure on GM to allocate alternative products and models in Antwerp and to get future volume as much as possible. This wasn't an easy business even for the GME management, because this kind of decision they can't take by themself. Where do now the 120.000 units for Antwerp come from? Originally, the plan was to produce more and more cars outside of the existing European plants, exporting more cars from Asia, producing more cars in new facilities in Eastern Europe. Can you image what it meant to get this 120.000 units for Antwerp? Sometimes you can have the impression that in the current struggle in the Antwerp plant this has been forgotten. GME Management gave also a clear committment to evaluate with the antwerp unions and the EEF until 2009 an additional model and one thing is also clear. Antwerp will produce these SUV models exclusively in Europe until 2016 and GME is willing to give a guarantuee for the plant until 2016. Which other plant has this kind of security at the moment? Yes, the job cuts are a big blow for the plant and difficult to accept for everybody, but would have been a closure the better alternative? Let's focus from the European perspective on 2 things: Getting a buy-out progamme which at least is the comparable with VW Brussels and getting an additional model until 2009 for the plant. To make this happen a 3 shift operation in the plant is absolutely crucial. The GM/GMS template is based on a 3 shift model and now it is also important to focus on a plan how the run out of the Astra and the decreasing volume during the life cycle can be combined with the production start of the new model and a potential 3rd model in the future. There is a lot work to do and the last thing the workers in Antwerp need are unions which are fighting against each other. Let's make a personal comment. I do not understand why people in this blog blaming Rudi Kennes for whatever. To be very honest without the work of the Delta group with Rudi as the chairman the Antwerp plant would no longer exist after the end of the current Astra. That's a simple truth. And it is also a simple truth that the strength of the Delta group was that the 2 big Antwerp unions were part of the group - the plant´representatives as well as the union secretaries and that we took all decisions together without fighting against each other. It was the job of Rudi Kennes (ABVV) and Luc van Grinsven (ACV) as worker representatives of the antwerp plant and members of the EEF to work together and with the EEF to keep the plant open. Even when the current situation hurts I think they did it successfully!

By the way, we should also not forget that the other Delta plants also facing difficult challenges. For example the Bochum plant will get the next Astra but the GM plan is to cut 1750 jobs. And the capacity utilization in Trolllhättan is also a real challenge. The GM plan is to cut 1400 jobs. So solidarity means also not to forget that other plants are facing also serious challenge´s despite they will get the next Delta. Our only chance to deal with GM successfully is to hold a united stand. But one thing is for sure nobody can really expect that we get all what we would like to have.

W.

I think one thing is clear what we can learn from the Delta experience. The legal European rights for workers and unions especially the European Works Councils are too weak and a right for strikes against closures doesn't exist in most of the EU countries. Why is it allowed that multinationals like GM can present economic figures how they like, change it how they like, set up criteria for product allocation and do not stick to it and so on. And one of the main problems is that the opportunities for blackmailing on a global level are growing but the EU and the national government do nothing about it. unions can be strong, unions can do hard and good work to protect the people as good as they can but without political changes on the national and european level you can't win these kind of fights against multinationals. You can soften the consequences like in this case to keep the plant open but we cannot easily force GM in Detroit to allocate all the products we would like to have. The only chance we have in this political environment ist to stick together across borders to develop common strategies and hold a united stand. Take a look on the gov ernments and mayors of the countries and cities of the DElta plants: Where there any joint meeting, any joint declaration or any phone call across the borders? NO! Every one of them were visited by GM on the way to collect subsidies. That's it. So let us make this case public, force your politicians to take initiatives to change for example the European directive for European Works Councils. We need more rights in a globalized world to protect the people and their families. Think about it and don't dam the unions.Why not publish the violating of workers rights in GM plants worldwide? Take a look on these cases and you can see what will happen when we would have less rights and weak unions.
I agree that fighting back makes a difference, but what I dont agree, is that it doesnt help to fight for weeks to a global company. I guarantee that the extra jobcuts (till 2250) wouldnt have extended if we hadn't stopped so soon. Because if you like it or not, GM (Europe and Detroit) wanted to close us down, but still does. And in fact, by organising ourself the referendum, we have put our head onto a guillotine.I still believe in the union (while most of the collegues gave the unions up), but it needs to be a union who dares to fight to "a global company" in a European context.
You are right, and the slogan of this site is "fighting back makes a difference", not fighting each other :)

If the management can divide the workers, they won.

Write a comment

See the anti spam word to type (This is to avoid automated comments used to spam)



Welcome

Topic

Location

Brand

Union

 
Welcome/Languages/English/